AMD Serija 400 (Polaris)

ma ne dobre sam volje pa zajebavam malo a i nema me vise cesto u topicu od kada rokam po PRO i VR-u  pa malo provociram 

pogotovo gosn Stepanja nista osobno 

a moze da sam poludio od VR-a isto 

 Ovo u zelenom aludira na nVidia-u " Upozorenje - loša-jadna Volta"

Evo nešto i sa Techpowerup-a

An ominously named website ve.ga surfaced on the web, pointing to the placeholder of a website AMD dedicated to its upcoming "Vega" GPU architecture. This placeholder has a word-cloud (or tag cloud), which is a 3D spacial clump of keywords/tags sorted by popularity. The words in this word-cloud could spell out key features of the "Vega" architecture, which AMD is expected to unveil later this week.

Here's what we make of these keywords:

• 8x Capacity/stack: This probably refers to the fact that HBM2 memory has 8 times the capacity per DRAM stack, as the first-generation HBM. While HBM1 maxed out at 4 GB over a 4096-bit interface (1 GB per stack), on the Radeon R9 Fury series; HBM2 allows you to cram up to 32 GB of memory (or 8 GB per stack), over a 4096-bit interface. This also means that whatever Vega-based AMD is going to launch, will come with HBM2 memory.
• 2x Bandwidth Per Pin: Refers to the increase in bandwidth per pin of HBM2. With a memory clock of 500 MHz, 4096-bit HBM2 could reach 1 TB/s. This gives AMD the cost-saving flexibility of deploying a 2048-bit memory bus with 8 GB of memory, and yet ending up with 512 GB/s bandwidth (more than that of the TITAN X Pascal).
• High Bandwidth Cache: This is a very curious phrase. Perhaps it means that AMD managed to increase the data throughput of the GPU's on-die caches, or, given the way this is worded, it could be a larger cache faster than the video-memory, which the GPU can use as a large scratchpad. The fact that another keyword in this cloud refers to a "high-bandwidth cache controller" adds weight to this theory.
• 512 TB Virtual Address Space: This adds even more weight to the theory that the HBM2 video memory, and the on-die L2 cache may not be the only physical memory on "Vega" graphics cards. The GPU probably needs a vast address space of up to 512 TB, to juggle data between the VRAM, caches, and the host.
• 4x Power Efficiency: This is probably just a 4x performance/Watt increase over the "Fiji" silicon, and shouldn't come as a surprise, given the new 14 nm process, and the energy-efficiency improvements AMD already made with "Polaris."
• Next Generation Compute[r] Engine: This probably refers to an upgraded compute unit (CU) design, which is at the heart of the 4x performance/Watt increases
• Primitive Shaders: If this is what we think it is, it's big. Most modern shader operations can be simplified into smaller, simpler operations.

Spominju se i najavljuju stvarno zanimljive tehnologije i novosti u zadnje vrijeme od strane amda. Nova godina bi trebala biti uzbudljiva i zbilja se nadam da će kupci prepoznati amdove napore te im uzvratiti povjerenjem.

To cemo moci rec tek kad budemo znali cijene...

Titov brlog.

Ti si dekintirao na Fury-ima tako da ni ti nemas sta komentirat novi hardware jer si ga ne mozes priustit 

Pa svaki novi amd-ov hardverski launch je potencijalna kataklizma za tvoj kucni budzet. Unistit ce te amd sinko 

Ja bar cuvam kucni budzet, 3k kn je meni max-maxeva sta cu dati za graficku..

Znači imam xfx rx 480 8gb uparenu sa i5 2500k na 4.4ghz i na bf1 imam gpu usage dropove nekad manje nekad više. Pa sada me zanima koliko je to normalno? Dali je problem u igri ili je cpu bottleneck? Reza je 1080p i imam 16gb ram-a.

hvala

Vrlo lako do same igre, nivoa detalja ali igra je veoma gladna CPU snage pogotovo MP tako da te to ne cudi apsolutno, komentar iznad nema veze sa tvojim slucajem.

ti sigurno imas...svi? lol daj molim te

Nije samo bf1 upitan nego ima puno više naslova gdje Amd ima taj problem čak i dok su bili pod imenom ati.Eto da sad ne bude da nešto pljujem po amd-u imaš benchmarkove pa pogledaj max mini sve će ti biti jasno.Nisam reko da Nvidia nema ima i ona ali kad pogledaš i usporedis dvije grafičke koje su u istom rangu onda ti bude sve jasno kolika je razlika.

di cu pogledat?znas kako se rece pics or it didnt happen.ma nezanima me ustvari,  nemoguce je da par razlicitih amd ahritektura ima isti problem bez obzira sta ih ista firma radi, obićni si fanboj.

Evo pogle si gore dva videa ali pazi da ne dobiješ infarkt