Tresla se brda, rodio se Leak

Oleg se kladio s Dragom, da će provocirati malo forumaše sa svojim stavom, pa da vidimo čija je tema najčitanija

Naravno!

Kad se svaki covjek na ovoj planeti pocne brinuti sam za sebe, a ne za druge, heaven follows.

Kako je to vec slozeno masu puta: treba prvo pocistiti svoje dvoriste, a tek onda pomoci s tudjim.

 molim da mi se kaže gdje sam ja koga brđanski vrijeđao i pljuvao. u protivnom ne bi bilo zgorega da se takve kao tebe sankcionira.

Evo jedna prikladnog naslova...

Ajme Bože...

Je li zbilja poterbno u forumskoj raspravi od sebe raditi Isusa.

A pomalo je bahato sebe i tu skupinu "istinaša" nazivati "nemoćnim žrtvama totalitarnog režima" koji su naj*bali jer su promicali "istinu".

Daješ previše značaja sebi, svojim uvjetovanim stajalištima (subjektivnima) i još praviš od neozbilljne rasprave na forumu slučaj Mandele.

Još malo pa ćeš umisliti da je ovo tatrljanje ravno činu onog Kineza na Tianamen trgu.

Pitam te sad direktno koju istinu tu promičeš?

Bez obzira na anonimnost, mislim da radi sebe samih moramo zadrzati neku dozu kulture i pristojnosti. Osim ako nemas nimalo samopostovanja. Onda budi seljak :)

 Nisam se "izvukao iz cijele rasprave" nego sam bio odsutan u trajanju dva, medium i short haul leta avionom, otprilike pola dana, a za to vrijeme ste nadrobili 130 (!!!!) komentara.

Međutim, nije to loše. Da sam bio online sigurno bi imao porive odgovarati i cjepidlačiti a sad kad gledam sve skupa - ovako je i bolje. Sve sam već odavno rekao, pa čak kako Drago kaže, i počeo raspravu "širiti horizontalno" a malo ih ima kapacitet pratiti Talleyrandovski um u takvoj horizontali  

Pitam samo sve svoje protivnike - jesu slatke Assangeove škude kojima VAS PLAČA!!!!!!!!!!! <= završavanje upitne rečenice uskličnicima, siguran znak forumske psihoze

Cesto se ne slazem s tobom, ali ovaj put si pogodio u sridu.

Mislim ono, prvo se podigla prasina u mainstream medijima da ce WL izbacit nesto jako vazno, pa onda kao DDOS napadi, i na kraju bombasticni naslovi tipa stotine tisuca dokumenata o svemu, a na kraju zanimljivih stvari za javnost ima jako malo, a jedna od tih je i odnos SA i Irana.

Vidim da nitko nije pratio moj hint, pa evo:

http://blogs.forbes.com/andygreenberg/2010/11/29/an-interview-with-wikileaks-julian-assange/

These megaleaks, as you call them that, we haven’t seen any of those from the private sector.

No, not at the same scale for the military.

Will we?

Yes. We have one related to a bank coming up, that’s a megaleak. It’s not as big a scale as the Iraq material, but it’s either tens or hundreds of thousands of documents depending on how you define it.

Is it a U.S. bank?

Yes, it’s a U.S. bank.

One that still exists?

Yes, a big U.S. bank.

The biggest U.S. bank?

No comment.

When will it happen?

Early next year. I won’t say more.

What do you want to be the result of this release?

[Pauses] I’m not sure.

It will give a true and representative insight into how banks behave at the executive level in a way that will stimulate investigations and reforms, I presume.

Usually when you get leaks at this level, it’s about one particular case or one particular violation. For this, there’s only one similar example. It’s like the Enron emails. Why were these so valuable? When Enron collapsed, through court processes, thousands and thousands of emails came out that were internal, and it provided a window into how the whole company was managed. It was all the little decisions that supported the flagrant violations.

This will be like that. Yes, there will be some flagrant violations, unethical practices that will be revealed, but it will also be all the supporting decision-making structures and the internal executive ethos that cames out, and that’s tremendously valuable. Like the Iraq War Logs, yes there were mass casualty incidents that were very newsworthy, but the great value is seeing the full spectrum of the war.

You could call it the ecosystem of corruption. But it’s also all the regular decision making that turns a blind eye to and supports unethical practices: the oversight that’s not done, the priorities of executives, how they think they’re fulfilling their own self-interest. The way they talk about it.

Zli Luđak kaže...

..posla s nikakvim osobitim borcem za pravdu, već likom koji se grebe za medijsku slavu samo na malo specifičniji način. Oprostit ću mu dio, ali neka drugi put barem bude zanimljiv!

- sačekaj koji mjesec, dok netko otkupi prava za film. Obično se to radi dok je osoba u pržunu.

A, o zakulisnim igrama, razlozoma likanja i istini ili 'istini'.. valjda 'Venecijanac' sve zna.... 

Pa tu su začeci čitave nove industrijske grane!  Za godinu dvije govorit ćemo o "Leak industryu" i pratiti koja kompanija ima koliki udio.

There have been reports that Daniel Domscheit-Berg, a German who used to work with WikiLeaks, has left to create his own WikiLeaks-type organization. The Wall Street Journal described him as a “competitor” to WikiLeaks. Do you see him as competition?

The supply of leaks is very large. It’s helpful for us to have more people in this industry. It’s protective to us.

Competitor LOL Intervju je urnebes! A pazi ovo:

What do you think of the idea of WikiLeaks copycats and spinoffs?

There have been a few over time, and they’ve been very dangerous. It’s not something that’s easy to do right. That’s the problem. Recently we saw a Chinese WikiLeaks. We encouraged them to come to us to work with us (znači već gleda preuzeti slabije "firme"). It would be nice to have more Chinese speakers working with us in a dedicated way. But what they’d set up had no meaningful security. They have no reputation you can trust. It’s very easy and very dangerous to do it wrong. (Ili si s WikiLeaksom pa ti vjeruju, a ako leakaš van WL-a onda si neko nepouzdano smeće.)

LOL! Valja paziti kod koga ćeš čitati leakove! Reputacija! Povjerenje! Mislim, halo, govorimo o tisućama hackiranih dokumenata?!?

U ovom zadnjem odgovoru me podsjeća na onu neku babu koja se bavi proricanjem, astrologijom, viskovima i slično, koja je nedavno tražila zabranu Vidovitog Milana, jer veli da im taj šarlatan narušava ugled, inače vrlo ugledne profesije

Sjajan intervju.

Al nije ovo Švedska pa prođeš kao Puki, a ne kao Assange (za kojeg tek treba vidjeti što će se eventualno desiti s njim)

Svaka ti dala! Napisao si sto se meni nije dalo i sto sam htio reci (manje-vise).