BSOD - što, zašto i kako izdvojena tema

poruka: 3.547
|
čitano: 1.243.989
|
moderatori: DrNasty, pirat, XXX-Man, Lazarus Long, vincimus
+/- sve poruke
ravni prikaz
starije poruke gore
16 godina
offline
Re: BSOD - što, zašto i kako
X-Factor kaže...

i7 2600

GA-H67MA-D2H

2x4 GB Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1333C9

HD WD Caviar Black 1 TB SATA3

 

Instalirao sam sve najnovije drivere, BIOS, rucno podesio memoriju u BIOS-u na postavke za memoriju kakve bi trebale biti, inace mi krivo ocitava memoriju, itd.....

 

10ak puta mi se rusio u zadnja 2-3 tjedna i svaki put kao problem nakon analize navodi ovaj: ntoskrnl.exe

-prepusti BIOSu postavke.

-ntoskrnl je osnova OSa -kernel, on sam nemože biti krivac (osim da je u pitanju virus pa poskeniraj 'just in case' s MBAMom).

C64/TurboModul-OpenSourceProject.org.cn.部分作品为网上收集整理,供开源爱好者学习使用
14 godina
neaktivan
offline
Re: BSOD - što, zašto i kako

A srusi mi se i kad su postavke na default....Dakle, memorija je 9-9-9-24 @ 1333 mhz, a BIOS po defaultu ocitava 7-7-7-20 @ 1066 mhz, tako da ja to rucno namjestim kako bi trebalo biti. Ali kao sto sam napisao, rusi se svejedno i uvijek je taj ntoskrnl.exe uzrok problemu.

16 godina
offline
Re: BSOD - što, zašto i kako
X-Factor kaže...

A srusi mi se i kad su postavke na default....Dakle, memorija je 9-9-9-24 @ 1333 mhz, a BIOS po defaultu ocitava 7-7-7-20 @ 1066 mhz, tako da ja to rucno namjestim kako bi trebalo biti. Ali kao sto sam napisao, rusi se svejedno i uvijek je taj ntoskrnl.exe uzrok problemu.

 -postavke RAMa se rade prema CPU i chipsetu (BIOS je postavio optimalno), tvornička deklaracija 1333-9 je samo normalna granica.

-obavezno provrti MemTest86+ (ima na svim liveCDima npr ubuntu i na repairu sedmice)

C64/TurboModul-OpenSourceProject.org.cn.部分作品为网上收集整理,供开源爱好者学习使用
14 godina
neaktivan
offline
BSOD - što, zašto i kako

Testirao sam memoriju sa zadnjim memtest-om za svaki stick posebno i zajedno po 4 pass-a, prebacivao sam i stickove iz slota u slot, pa opet testirao.....nije naslo nikakav error.

 
0 0 hvala 0
16 godina
offline
Re: BSOD - što, zašto i kako

.. počni sumnjati u ispravnost ploče (možda CPU). To je problem s novim serijama CPU+MBO što ih obično netko prije prodaje 'izmrcvari', možda čak u BUGovom testlabu.

konkretniji test bi bilo korištenje nekog npr ubuntua nekoliko sati .. jedan dan. (provjeri svoju verziju sedmice...tj. dali je normalna aktivacija ili ona druga?)

C64/TurboModul-OpenSourceProject.org.cn.部分作品为网上收集整理,供开源爱好者学习使用
14 godina
neaktivan
offline
BSOD - što, zašto i kako

Ma ja mislim da nesto s maticnom nije u redu, jer ja u BIOS-u namjestim postavke za memoriju 9-9-9-24 1333 mhz, default je 7-7-7-20 1066 mhz. Ali sam skuzio, kad koristim samo jedan stick (bilo koji), stavim ga u prvi slot, memtest i cpuz ocitaju memoriju onako kakva je postavka u BIOS-u....ali kad stavim taj isti stick u drugi slot, memtest i cpuz ocitavaju memoriju kao 6-6-6-20 @ 1066 mhz iako je u BIOS-u onako kako sam ja namjestio, cak ni kad je default ne ocitava kako treba, dakle....nesto s ovim drugim slot-om nije u redu, bar ja mislim.

Poruka je uređivana zadnji put pon 14.2.2011 11:05 (X-Factor).
 
0 0 hvala 0
14 godina
neaktivan
offline
BSOD - što, zašto i kako

Evo novi BSOD....ali ovaj put sa greskom ntfs.sys. Poludit cu vise.... :/

 
0 0 hvala 0
15 godina
offline
BSOD - što, zašto i kako

BSOD nekad nakon uštekavanja vanjskih memorija na prednje USB konektore. Bili oni flash stickovi ili HDD-ovi..

Kaj vam treba za dijagnostiku?

Evo .dmp file od zadnjeg BSOD-a (valjda, osim ak se ne generiraju i bez BSOD-a). DOWNLOAD

www.damagehigh.co.cc // Don't fix what ain't broken!
 
0 0 hvala 0
14 godina
neaktivan
offline
BSOD - što, zašto i kako

Evo i moj dmp file....pa ako netko moze pogledat, bio bih vrlo zahvalan.

 

http://hotfile.com/dl/104887280/a116227/021411-25334-01.rar.html

 
0 0 hvala 0
17 godina
neaktivan
moderator
offline
Re: BSOD - što, zašto i kako
DamageHigh kaže...

BSOD nekad nakon uštekavanja vanjskih memorija na prednje USB konektore. Bili oni flash stickovi ili HDD-ovi..

Kaj vam treba za dijagnostiku?

Evo .dmp file od zadnjeg BSOD-a (valjda, osim ak se ne generiraju i bez BSOD-a). DOWNLOAD

  Disjeblaj/onemoguci CloneCD ili CloneDVD ili bilo sto radi putem emulacije (Alcohol, PowerISO...), takode privremeno onemoguci Bluetooth ako je preko donglea (USB stick)

Koji antivirus imas? Da li ti je onemogucen Autoplay na Windowsima?

Kako prebaciti BUGov DVD u DivX da mi stane na obicni CD. (probao sam sa Dr DivX ali nejde
15 godina
offline
Re: BSOD - što, zašto i kako

Disableao sam Virtual CloneDrive i sada sam probao par puta s USB-om (nemam sad eksterni hard pri ruci) i sve je OK.

Autoplay je omogućen, ali evo, sada ću i njega isključiti. Btw. imam i Bluetooth donge..hehe..

AV je Avast!. Hvala, u svakom slučaju. Ako se pojavi opet, probat ću i iskopčavanjem Bluetootha.

www.damagehigh.co.cc // Don't fix what ain't broken!
17 godina
neaktivan
moderator
offline
Re: BSOD - što, zašto i kako
DamageHigh kaže...

Disableao sam Virtual CloneDrive

  (nikad ne propustam priliku da ga pohvalim)

 

Ne znam zbog kojih razloga koristis Virtual CloneDrive ali PowerISO (bar koliko ja znam) zadaje najmanje muke po tom pitanju. Mounta po potrebi i ne cuci virtualno kao ostali. Ostali stavljaju svoj "pogon" prilikom pokretanja a razni programi (explorer.exe prije svega) pokusavaju mu pristupiti (antivirus...) i nastane kolizija ...plava kolizija :)

Kako prebaciti BUGov DVD u DivX da mi stane na obicni CD. (probao sam sa Dr DivX ali nejde
15 godina
offline
Re: BSOD - što, zašto i kako
Heh..ok onda..dozivjet ce uninstall.
www.damagehigh.co.cc // Don't fix what ain't broken!
16 godina
protjeran
offline
BSOD - što, zašto i kako

Evo već me nekoliko tjedana muči i tlači dotični BSOD. Overclockao sam proc i grafe (puno prije javljanja BSOD-a), ali sve je stabilno u Primeu, IBT-u i FurMarku te u igrama, dapače ''nahranio'' sam proc s još malo voltaže za svaki slučaj. Javlja se bilo kada i stvarno iritira moram priznati. Nisam još testirao RAM, trebao bih valjda. Još uvijek se nadam da je problem softverski, registar ili tako nešto. Evo par slikica BlueScreenView-a; ovi pri dnu su nešto raniji vjerojatno vezani uz moje zahebavanje s virtualnom memorijom. Unaprijed hvala.

 

EDIT: Ovaj aswSP.SYS je čini se Avastov driver valjda i ima još ljudi problema s njim, treba reinstall valjda?

 

 

 

Gott mit uns!
Poruka je uređivana zadnji put pet 18.2.2011 18:28 (Silence1488).
Moj PC  
0 0 hvala 0
16 godina
protjeran
offline
BSOD - što, zašto i kako

Evo i minidumpova, bio bih zahvalan da netko pogleda {#}

 

http://www.fileserve.com/file/bwZNRbf

 

EDIT: Nova greška ovaj put je PAGE_FAULT_IN_NONPAGED_AREA pa sve više sumnjam na RAM.

 

http://www.fileserve.com/file/k7JdFcM (minidump)

 

 

 

 

Gott mit uns!
Poruka je uređivana zadnji put pet 18.2.2011 21:50 (Silence1488).
Moj PC  
0 0 hvala 0
17 godina
neaktivan
moderator
offline
Re: BSOD - što, zašto i kako
Silence1488 kaže...

 

 

EDIT: Nova greška ovaj put je PAGE_FAULT_IN_NONPAGED_AREA  pa sve više sumnjam na RAM.

  Ispravno sumnjas. Skini Memtest86+ i napravi bootabilni USB. Ako si clockao grafu onda je vrati natrag, BIOS postavi na  Setup Defaults odnosno u BIOS-u odaberi  Load Setup Defaults  ili moze pisati  Fail Safe

 

Ako imas vise mem. modula i ako Memtest kaze da imas pokvarenu memoriju onda testiraj jedan po jedan keks. Ako se ispostavi da kvar nije u RAM-u onda krivca trazi u grafu. Kada otklonis sve (RAM i graficka) onda se baci na testiranje HDD-a sa programom koji daje proizvodac (imaju ih svi)

I na kraju, ako je sve okay onda sistem skeniras od virusa i najbitnije od rootkitova

 

Inace razliciti BSOD-i obicno upucuju na pokvareni RAM

Ako niste dio rješenja onda ste ... kolumnist!
Poruka je uređivana zadnji put sub 19.2.2011 9:35 (Lazarus Long).
16 godina
protjeran
offline
BSOD - što, zašto i kako

Smanjio sam OC, sad sam na 3.4 GHz i ostavit ću ga tako nema veze jer mi je lik koji mi je stavljao Windoze rekao da se hal.dll i kernel ruše prvenstveno zbog lošeg OC-a. Očito nisam baš imao sreće pri kupnji chipa; grafe su testirane sat vremena u FurMarku i nije se rušilo ništa kao ni u igrama. Većinu BSOD-a je uzrokovao Avastov driver s kojim dosta ljudi ima problema inače (svi oni preporučaju Microsoft Security Essentials za koji nisam ni čuo moram priznati), ali valjda je rješeno sa RegCureom koji je našao preko 900 grešaka...

 

Javim kada završim sa Memtestom, par sati će biti dosta; latencije su dobre to sam provjerio odmah. RAM je Corsair, ne znam ako to nešto znači danas više ionako.

Gott mit uns!
Moj PC  
0 0 hvala 0
15 godina
offline
Re: BSOD - što, zašto i kako
Silence1488 kaže...

Većinu BSOD-a je uzrokovao Avastov driver s kojim dosta ljudi ima problema inače (svi oni preporučaju Microsoft Security Essentials za koji nisam ni čuo moram priznati), ali valjda je rješeno sa RegCureom koji je našao preko 900 grešaka...

Svi ParetoLogicovi proizvodi su fake (točnije, rogue), pa tako i RegCure. Odmah ga deinstaliraj i proskeniraj komp MBAM-om.

 

http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/regcure.com

the funniest thing about this particular signature is that by the time you realise it doesn't say anything it's too late to stop reading it
16 godina
protjeran
offline
Re: BSOD - što, zašto i kako
deadman kaže...
Silence1488 kaže...

Većinu BSOD-a je uzrokovao Avastov driver s kojim dosta ljudi ima problema inače (svi oni preporučaju Microsoft Security Essentials za koji nisam ni čuo moram priznati), ali valjda je rješeno sa RegCureom koji je našao preko 900 grešaka...

Svi ParetoLogicovi proizvodi su fake (točnije, rogue), pa tako i RegCure. Odmah ga deinstaliraj i proskeniraj komp MBAM-om.

 

http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/regcure.com

Deinstaliran RegCure i napravljen full scan sa MBAM-om bez ikakvih zaraženih fajlova. Nije mi se javio BSOD već skoro 24 sata, a to je napredak sigurno.

Gott mit uns!
16 godina
protjeran
offline
BSOD - što, zašto i kako

Evo 2 passa u Memtestu86+ 4.20 bez grešaka (2 sata - dosta ljudi po forumima kaže da je to dovoljno) pa je RAM valjda izbačen iz priče. Može li mi netko reći postoji li kakav sličan ekvivalent Memtestu samo za grafičke kartice i diskove, bio bih zahvalan.

 

Off topic: Kako je moguće da je pod ''First Boot Device'' bio stavljen CDROM po defaultu, umjesto Hard Diska? Mislim da to nema smisla, pa sam to ručno sad promijenio - glupi Gigabyte... uvijek sam se čudio zašto mi se sporije boot-a {#}

Gott mit uns!
Moj PC  
0 0 hvala 0
17 godina
neaktivan
moderator
offline
Re: BSOD - što, zašto i kako
Silence1488 kaže...

Može li mi netko reći postoji li kakav sličan ekvivalent Memtestu samo za grafičke kartice i diskove, bio bih zahvalan.

 

Off topic: Kako je moguće da je pod ''First Boot Device'' bio stavljen CDROM po defaultu, umjesto Hard Diska? Mislim da to nema smisla, pa sam to ručno sad promijenio - glupi Gigabyte... uvijek sam se čudio zašto mi se sporije boot-a  {#}

  Prvo za OFF topic. Gigabyte nije glup, skoro na svim maticnim first boot device je CD-ROM a na nekima je floppy (ako ga ima) i naravno sve to zavisi od BIOS venodora (da li je AMI ili Phoenix ...) Dakle stavis rucno first boot da ti bude HDD i mirna backa

 

Sto se tice testiranja video memorije, testiraj sa ovim

 

Video Memory Stress Test 1.7.116 

Ako niste dio rješenja onda ste ... kolumnist!
15 godina
offline
BSOD - što, zašto i kako

Evo, prije nekoliko dana mi se dogodio bsod, analizirao sam ga i uz vasu pomoc sam saznao da je rijec ili o virusu ili o nekom problemu sa grafickom...

Danas, nakon sto sam vidio post @Lazarus Long-a, odlucio sam se testirati video memoriju i voila... opet bsod

Ovaj put cu uploadati dump umjesto da ovdje post-am analizu.

 

Minidump

 

Unaprijed Hvala!!

Google is NOT your friend!!!
Moj PC  
0 0 hvala 0
16 godina
protjeran
offline
Re: BSOD - što, zašto i kako
passat kaže...

Evo, prije nekoliko dana mi se dogodio bsod, analizirao sam ga i uz vasu pomoc sam saznao da je rijec ili o virusu ili o nekom problemu sa grafickom...

Danas, nakon sto sam vidio post @Lazarus Long-a, odlucio sam se testirati video memoriju i voila... opet bsod

Ovaj put cu uploadati dump umjesto da ovdje post-am analizu.

 

Minidump

 

Unaprijed Hvala!!

Mislim da bi trebao testirati u ''Clean Enviromentu'' odnosno u DOS-u jer ćeš samo tako vidjeti koje ti greške izbacuje. Dobio si downloadom podfolder di ti je iso image file i samo ga sprži na CD (tako ću ja) i pokreni iz BIOS-a direktno.

Gott mit uns!
Poruka je uređivana zadnji put ned 20.2.2011 17:44 (Silence1488).
15 godina
offline
Re: BSOD - što, zašto i kako
Silence1488 kaže...
passat kaže...

Evo, prije nekoliko dana mi se dogodio bsod, analizirao sam ga i uz vasu pomoc sam saznao da je rijec ili o virusu ili o nekom problemu sa grafickom...

Danas, nakon sto sam vidio post @Lazarus Long-a, odlucio sam se testirati video memoriju i voila... opet bsod

Ovaj put cu uploadati dump umjesto da ovdje post-am analizu.

 

Minidump

 

Unaprijed Hvala!!

Mislim da bi trebao testirati u ''Clean Enviromentu'' odnosno u DOS-u jer ćeš samo tako vidjeti koje ti greške izbacuje. Dobio si downloadom podfolder di ti je iso image file i samo ga sprži na CD (tako ću ja) i pokreni iu BIOS-a direktno.

Ok, ali ako bi mi netko bar mogao natuknuti o cemu se radi, jer ako sad budem "expermentirao" pa mi grafa ode, nemam druge nego mijenjati cijelu maticnu(laptop), a garancija mi je istekla prije tjedan dana..

Dakle ostaje mi mogucnost da garanciju produljim, pa nek se oni igraju sa njom kad crkne.

 

Da preformuliram pitanje: Jeli moj minidump izravno "povezan" sa grafickom??

Google is NOT your friend!!!
Poruka je uređivana zadnji put ned 20.2.2011 16:49 (passat).
16 godina
protjeran
offline
Re: BSOD - što, zašto i kako
passat kaže...
Silence1488 kaže...
passat kaže...

Evo, prije nekoliko dana mi se dogodio bsod, analizirao sam ga i uz vasu pomoc sam saznao da je rijec ili o virusu ili o nekom problemu sa grafickom...

Danas, nakon sto sam vidio post @Lazarus Long-a, odlucio sam se testirati video memoriju i voila... opet bsod

Ovaj put cu uploadati dump umjesto da ovdje post-am analizu.

 

Minidump

 

Unaprijed Hvala!!

Mislim da bi trebao testirati u ''Clean Enviromentu'' odnosno u DOS-u jer ćeš samo tako vidjeti koje ti greške izbacuje. Dobio si downloadom podfolder di ti je iso image file i samo ga sprži na CD (tako ću ja) i pokreni iu BIOS-a direktno.

Ok, ali ako bi mi netko bar mogao natuknuti o cemu se radi, jer ako sad budem "expermentirao" pa mi grafa ode, nemam druge nego mijenjati cijelu maticnu(laptop), a garancija mi je istekla prije tjedan dana..

Dakle ostaje mi mogucnost da garanciju produljim, pa nek se oni igraju sa njom kad crkne.

 

Da preformuliram pitanje: Jeli moj minidump izravno "povezan" sa grafickom??

Vidim da imaš Intelovu integriranu grafiku, a ovaj igxpdx32.dll je njen driver koji se čini nekako corruptao putem tako da je odgovor na tvoje pitanje ''da'' {#} Potraži na netu neke tutoriale kako to ispraviti, ima sigurno.

Gott mit uns!
14 godina
neaktivan
offline
BSOD - što, zašto i kako

evo imam problem sa BSOD-om i nemogu ga rijesiti tutorialom sa pocetka pa bi vas jako molio za pomoc...

 

Prilikom bilo kakve instalacije bilo kakvog programa ili igre mi se smrzne komp i dobijem BSOD s natpisom "IRQL not less or equal"...htio sam se posluziti tutorialom sa pocetka ali prilikom instalacije Frameworka 4 koji mi je bio potreban da bi nastavio s tutorialom mi se vec opet smrzno komp...događa se samo prilikom instalacije drugih programa...Proc mi je bio clockan i grafa isto i sve je radilo super do prije tjedan dana, prvo sam mislio da je to slučajno, ali kad sam ponovo htio sam opet dobio isti BSOD...molim vas za pomoč ako nije problem...imam i sliku BSOD-a, ali neznam dali vam to ista pomaze posto ste na pocetku naveli da bas taj natpis u BSOD-u moze znaciti puno toga...pa mene sad interesira, dali bi se moglo to rijesiti recimo reinstalacijom Windowsa+Formatiranje C diska???

 

hvala unaprijed...

 

evo i slike BSOD-a:

http://img191.imageshack.us/i/dsc00063bn.jpg/

[img]http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/6127/bradygamesstrategyguide.jpg[img]
Moj PC  
0 0 hvala 0
17 godina
neaktivan
offline
BSOD - što, zašto i kako

neznam da li će ovo kome pomoći, no do prije mjesec dana sam imao konstantne BSOD-ove u sasvim različitim situacijama (imate moje postove iznad), unatoč svakakvim pokušajima da to riješim (formatiranje diska, reinstalacija, testiranje i zamjena nekih komponenti i sl.). ni na kraj pameti mi nije bilo da bi disejblana wireless kartica mogla biti uzrok. bezveze sam ju izvadio van, jer ju nisam koristio mjesecima, i voila, nema vise plavih ekrana za mene :D

neznam kako\zašto, al eto, živim happily ever after :D

 

tak da, provjerite i ostale komponente, možda vam one zagorčavaju život, mene je wireless kartica počela zezat mjesec-dva nakon kaj sam ju disejblao.

Poruka je uređivana zadnji put pet 25.2.2011 22:41 (thucydides).
Moj PC  
0 0 hvala 0
15 godina
offline
Re: BSOD - što, zašto i kako
scOOby kaže...

evo imam problem sa BSOD-om i nemogu ga rijesiti tutorialom sa pocetka pa bi vas jako molio za pomoc...

 

Prilikom bilo kakve instalacije bilo kakvog programa ili igre mi se smrzne komp i dobijem BSOD s natpisom "IRQL not less or equal"...htio sam se posluziti tutorialom sa pocetka ali prilikom instalacije Frameworka 4 koji mi je bio potreban da bi nastavio s tutorialom mi se vec opet smrzno komp...događa se samo prilikom instalacije drugih programa...Proc mi je bio clockan i grafa isto i sve je radilo super do prije tjedan dana, prvo sam mislio da je to slučajno, ali kad sam ponovo htio sam opet dobio isti BSOD...molim vas za pomoč ako nije problem...imam i sliku BSOD-a, ali neznam dali vam to ista pomaze posto ste na pocetku naveli da bas taj natpis u BSOD-u moze znaciti puno toga...pa mene sad interesira, dali bi se moglo to rijesiti recimo reinstalacijom Windowsa+Formatiranje C diska???

 

hvala unaprijed...

 

evo i slike BSOD-a:

http://img191.imageshack.us/i/dsc00063bn.jpg/

Upload-aj nam minidump iz mape C/Windows/minidump

Google is NOT your friend!!!
15 godina
neaktivan
offline
BSOD - što, zašto i kako

Može pomoč oko ovoga:

 

Microsoft (R) Windows Debugger Version 6.12.0002.633 X86
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.


Loading Dump File [C:\Windows\Minidump\022711-35365-01.dmp]
Mini Kernel Dump File: Only registers and stack trace are available

Symbol search path is: C:\Windows\symbols
Executable search path is:
Unable to load image \SystemRoot\system32\ntkrnlpa.exe, Win32 error 0n2
*** WARNING: Unable to verify timestamp for ntkrnlpa.exe
*** ERROR: Module load completed but symbols could not be loaded for ntkrnlpa.exe
Windows 7 Kernel Version 7600 MP (4 procs) Free x86 compatible
Product: WinNt, suite: TerminalServer SingleUserTS
Built by: 7600.16695.x86fre.win7_gdr.101026-1503
Machine Name:
Kernel base = 0x82e54000 PsLoadedModuleList = 0x82f9c810
Debug session time: Sat Feb 26 22:46:24.497 2011 (UTC + 1:00)
System Uptime: 0 days 0:00:22.105
Unable to load image \SystemRoot\system32\ntkrnlpa.exe, Win32 error 0n2
*** WARNING: Unable to verify timestamp for ntkrnlpa.exe
*** ERROR: Module load completed but symbols could not be loaded for ntkrnlpa.exe
Loading Kernel Symbols
...............................................................
................................................................
..............
Loading User Symbols
Loading unloaded module list
.....
Unable to load image \SystemRoot\system32\DRIVERS\athur.sys, Win32 error 0n2
*** WARNING: Unable to verify timestamp for athur.sys
*** ERROR: Module load completed but symbols could not be loaded for athur.sys
*******************************************************************************
*                                                                             *
*                        Bugcheck Analysis                                    *
*                                                                             *
*******************************************************************************

Use !analyze -v to get detailed debugging information.

BugCheck 1000007E, {c0000005, 92286874, 96eecc78, 96eec850}

***** Kernel symbols are WRONG. Please fix symbols to do analysis.

*************************************************************************
***                                                                   ***
***                                                                   ***
***    Your debugger is not using the correct symbols                 ***
***                                                                   ***
***    In order for this command to work properly, your symbol path   ***
***    must point to .pdb files that have full type information.      ***
***                                                                   ***
***    Certain .pdb files (such as the public OS symbols) do not      ***
***    contain the required information.  Contact the group that      ***
***    provided you with these symbols if you need this command to    ***
***    work.                                                          ***
***                                                                   ***
***    Type referenced: nt!_KPRCB                                     ***
***                                                                   ***
*************************************************************************
*************************************************************************
***                                                                   ***
***                                                                   ***
***    Your debugger is not using the correct symbols                 ***
***                                                                   ***
***    In order for this command to work properly, your symbol path   ***
***    must point to .pdb files that have full type information.      ***
***                                                                   ***
***    Certain .pdb files (such as the public OS symbols) do not      ***
***    contain the required information.  Contact the group that      ***
***    provided you with these symbols if you need this command to    ***
***    work.                                                          ***
***                                                                   ***
***    Type referenced: nt!_KPRCB                                     ***
***                                                                   ***
*************************************************************************
*************************************************************************
***                                                                   ***
***                                                                   ***
***    Your debugger is not using the correct symbols                 ***
***                                                                   ***
***    In order for this command to work properly, your symbol path   ***
***    must point to .pdb files that have full type information.      ***
***                                                                   ***
***    Certain .pdb files (such as the public OS symbols) do not      ***
***    contain the required information.  Contact the group that      ***
***    provided you with these symbols if you need this command to    ***
***    work.                                                          ***
***                                                                   ***
***    Type referenced: nt!_KPRCB                                     ***
***                                                                   ***
*************************************************************************
Probably caused by : athur.sys ( athur+d874 )

Followup: MachineOwner
---------

2: kd> !analyze -v
*******************************************************************************
*                                                                             *
*                        Bugcheck Analysis                                    *
*                                                                             *
*******************************************************************************

SYSTEM_THREAD_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED_M (1000007e)
This is a very common bugcheck.  Usually the exception address pinpoints
the driver/function that caused the problem.  Always note this address
as well as the link date of the driver/image that contains this address.
Some common problems are exception code 0x80000003.  This means a hard
coded breakpoint or assertion was hit, but this system was booted
/NODEBUG.  This is not supposed to happen as developers should never have
hardcoded breakpoints in retail code, but ...
If this happens, make sure a debugger gets connected, and the
system is booted /DEBUG.  This will let us see why this breakpoint is
happening.
Arguments:
Arg1: c0000005, The exception code that was not handled
Arg2: 92286874, The address that the exception occurred at
Arg3: 96eecc78, Exception Record Address
Arg4: 96eec850, Context Record Address

Debugging Details:
------------------

***** Kernel symbols are WRONG. Please fix symbols to do analysis.

*************************************************************************
***                                                                   ***
***                                                                   ***
***    Your debugger is not using the correct symbols                 ***
***                                                                   ***
***    In order for this command to work properly, your symbol path   ***
***    must point to .pdb files that have full type information.      ***
***                                                                   ***
***    Certain .pdb files (such as the public OS symbols) do not      ***
***    contain the required information.  Contact the group that      ***
***    provided you with these symbols if you need this command to    ***
***    work.                                                          ***
***                                                                   ***
***    Type referenced: nt!_KPRCB                                     ***
***                                                                   ***
*************************************************************************
*************************************************************************
***                                                                   ***
***                                                                   ***
***    Your debugger is not using the correct symbols                 ***
***                                                                   ***
***    In order for this command to work properly, your symbol path   ***
***    must point to .pdb files that have full type information.      ***
***                                                                   ***
***    Certain .pdb files (such as the public OS symbols) do not      ***
***    contain the required information.  Contact the group that      ***
***    provided you with these symbols if you need this command to    ***
***    work.                                                          ***
***                                                                   ***
***    Type referenced: nt!_KPRCB                                     ***
***                                                                   ***
*************************************************************************
*************************************************************************
***                                                                   ***
***                                                                   ***
***    Your debugger is not using the correct symbols                 ***
***                                                                   ***
***    In order for this command to work properly, your symbol path   ***
***    must point to .pdb files that have full type information.      ***
***                                                                   ***
***    Certain .pdb files (such as the public OS symbols) do not      ***
***    contain the required information.  Contact the group that      ***
***    provided you with these symbols if you need this command to    ***
***    work.                                                          ***
***                                                                   ***
***    Type referenced: nt!_KPRCB                                     ***
***                                                                   ***
*************************************************************************

ADDITIONAL_DEBUG_TEXT: 
Use '!findthebuild' command to search for the target build information.
If the build information is available, run '!findthebuild -s ; .reload' to set symbol path and load symbols.

MODULE_NAME: athur

FAULTING_MODULE: 82e54000 nt

DEBUG_FLR_IMAGE_TIMESTAMP:  4a30ef61

EXCEPTION_CODE: (NTSTATUS) 0xc0000005 - The instruction at 0x%08lx referenced memory at 0x%08lx. The memory could not be %s.

FAULTING_IP:
athur+d874
92286874 8b88f8210000    mov     ecx,dword ptr [eax+21F8h]

EXCEPTION_RECORD:  96eecc78 -- (.exr 0xffffffff96eecc78)
ExceptionAddress: 92286874 (athur+0x0000d874)
   ExceptionCode: c0000005 (Access violation)
  ExceptionFlags: 00000000
NumberParameters: 2
   Parameter[0]: 00000000
   Parameter[1]: 000021f8
Attempt to read from address 000021f8

CONTEXT:  96eec850 -- (.cxr 0xffffffff96eec850)
eax=00000000 ebx=00000000 ecx=0000000a edx=87931020 esi=879f2a18 edi=00000000
eip=92286874 esp=96eecd40 ebp=96eecd50 iopl=0         nv up ei pl zr na pe nc
cs=0008  ss=0010  ds=0023  es=0023  fs=0030  gs=0000             efl=00210246
athur+0xd874:
92286874 8b88f8210000    mov     ecx,dword ptr [eax+21F8h] ds:0023:000021f8=????????
Resetting default scope

CUSTOMER_CRASH_COUNT:  1

DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID:  VISTA_DRIVER_FAULT

BUGCHECK_STR:  0x7E

CURRENT_IRQL:  0

LAST_CONTROL_TRANSFER:  from 830629df to 92286874

STACK_TEXT: 
WARNING: Stack unwind information not available. Following frames may be wrong.
96eecd50 830629df 87931020 ba5ff329 00000000 athur+0xd874
96eecd90 82f141d9 922867f0 87931020 00000000 nt+0x20e9df
00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 nt+0xc01d9


FOLLOWUP_IP:
athur+d874
92286874 8b88f8210000    mov     ecx,dword ptr [eax+21F8h]

SYMBOL_STACK_INDEX:  0

SYMBOL_NAME:  athur+d874

FOLLOWUP_NAME:  MachineOwner

IMAGE_NAME:  athur.sys

STACK_COMMAND:  .cxr 0xffffffff96eec850 ; kb

BUCKET_ID:  WRONG_SYMBOLS

Followup: MachineOwner
---------

2: kd> !analyze-v
No export analyze-v found
2: kd> !analyze -v
*******************************************************************************
*                                                                             *
*                        Bugcheck Analysis                                    *
*                                                                             *
*******************************************************************************

SYSTEM_THREAD_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED_M (1000007e)
This is a very common bugcheck.  Usually the exception address pinpoints
the driver/function that caused the problem.  Always note this address
as well as the link date of the driver/image that contains this address.
Some common problems are exception code 0x80000003.  This means a hard
coded breakpoint or assertion was hit, but this system was booted
/NODEBUG.  This is not supposed to happen as developers should never have
hardcoded breakpoints in retail code, but ...
If this happens, make sure a debugger gets connected, and the
system is booted /DEBUG.  This will let us see why this breakpoint is
happening.
Arguments:
Arg1: c0000005, The exception code that was not handled
Arg2: 92286874, The address that the exception occurred at
Arg3: 96eecc78, Exception Record Address
Arg4: 96eec850, Context Record Address

Debugging Details:
------------------

***** Kernel symbols are WRONG. Please fix symbols to do analysis.

*************************************************************************
***                                                                   ***
***                                                                   ***
***    Your debugger is not using the correct symbols                 ***
***                                                                   ***
***    In order for this command to work properly, your symbol path   ***
***    must point to .pdb files that have full type information.      ***
***                                                                   ***
***    Certain .pdb files (such as the public OS symbols) do not      ***
***    contain the required information.  Contact the group that      ***
***    provided you with these symbols if you need this command to    ***
***    work.                                                          ***
***                                                                   ***
***    Type referenced: nt!_KPRCB                                     ***
***                                                                   ***
*************************************************************************
*************************************************************************
***                                                                   ***
***                                                                   ***
***    Your debugger is not using the correct symbols                 ***
***                                                                   ***
***    In order for this command to work properly, your symbol path   ***
***    must point to .pdb files that have full type information.      ***
***                                                                   ***
***    Certain .pdb files (such as the public OS symbols) do not      ***
***    contain the required information.  Contact the group that      ***
***    provided you with these symbols if you need this command to    ***
***    work.                                                          ***
***                                                                   ***
***    Type referenced: nt!_KPRCB                                     ***
***                                                                   ***
*************************************************************************
*************************************************************************
***                                                                   ***
***                                                                   ***
***    Your debugger is not using the correct symbols                 ***
***                                                                   ***
***    In order for this command to work properly, your symbol path   ***
***    must point to .pdb files that have full type information.      ***
***                                                                   ***
***    Certain .pdb files (such as the public OS symbols) do not      ***
***    contain the required information.  Contact the group that      ***
***    provided you with these symbols if you need this command to    ***
***    work.                                                          ***
***                                                                   ***
***    Type referenced: nt!_KPRCB                                     ***
***                                                                   ***
*************************************************************************

ADDITIONAL_DEBUG_TEXT: 
Use '!findthebuild' command to search for the target build information.
If the build information is available, run '!findthebuild -s ; .reload' to set symbol path and load symbols.

MODULE_NAME: athur

FAULTING_MODULE: 82e54000 nt

DEBUG_FLR_IMAGE_TIMESTAMP:  4a30ef61

EXCEPTION_CODE: (NTSTATUS) 0xc0000005 - The instruction at 0x%08lx referenced memory at 0x%08lx. The memory could not be %s.

FAULTING_IP:
athur+d874
92286874 8b88f8210000    mov     ecx,dword ptr [eax+21F8h]

EXCEPTION_RECORD:  96eecc78 -- (.exr 0xffffffff96eecc78)
ExceptionAddress: 92286874 (athur+0x0000d874)
   ExceptionCode: c0000005 (Access violation)
  ExceptionFlags: 00000000
NumberParameters: 2
   Parameter[0]: 00000000
   Parameter[1]: 000021f8
Attempt to read from address 000021f8

CONTEXT:  96eec850 -- (.cxr 0xffffffff96eec850)
eax=00000000 ebx=00000000 ecx=0000000a edx=87931020 esi=879f2a18 edi=00000000
eip=92286874 esp=96eecd40 ebp=96eecd50 iopl=0         nv up ei pl zr na pe nc
cs=0008  ss=0010  ds=0023  es=0023  fs=0030  gs=0000             efl=00210246
athur+0xd874:
92286874 8b88f8210000    mov     ecx,dword ptr [eax+21F8h] ds:0023:000021f8=????????
Resetting default scope

CUSTOMER_CRASH_COUNT:  1

DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID:  VISTA_DRIVER_FAULT

BUGCHECK_STR:  0x7E

CURRENT_IRQL:  0

LAST_CONTROL_TRANSFER:  from 830629df to 92286874

STACK_TEXT: 
WARNING: Stack unwind information not available. Following frames may be wrong.
96eecd50 830629df 87931020 ba5ff329 00000000 athur+0xd874
96eecd90 82f141d9 922867f0 87931020 00000000 nt+0x20e9df
00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 nt+0xc01d9


FOLLOWUP_IP:
athur+d874
92286874 8b88f8210000    mov     ecx,dword ptr [eax+21F8h]

SYMBOL_STACK_INDEX:  0

SYMBOL_NAME:  athur+d874

FOLLOWUP_NAME:  MachineOwner

IMAGE_NAME:  athur.sys

STACK_COMMAND:  .cxr 0xffffffff96eec850 ; kb

BUCKET_ID:  WRONG_SYMBOLS

Followup: MachineOwner
---------


BFBC2: ALIEN464
Moj PC  
0 0 hvala 0
15 godina
offline
BSOD - što, zašto i kako

Dečki, može brzinska analiza ovoga. Sad je za frenda..nov novcat komp..

Hvala.

DL dump

www.damagehigh.co.cc // Don't fix what ain't broken!
 
0 0 hvala 0
E-mail:
Lozinka:
 
vrh stranice