OS X, iOS i Linux najnesigurniji OS-ovi u 2014.

 Ma ništ posebno,bar ne ništa što nije opće poznato.Ionako umjesto kritike po winsima bih udario pozitivnu afirmaciju po Linuxu.

@bunkermax

pa čudi me da ti to ne znaš. radi se o tome da Linux kernel nema unutarnji stabilni API, 'internal stable API'. evo laički objašnjeno od kernel developera. ovo bih uveo kao lektiru ;) 

http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/ols_2006_keynote.html

It explains why Linux doesn't have a stable in-kernel api, and why it never will. It all goes back to the evolution thing. If we were to freeze how the kernel works internally, we would not be able to evolve in ways that we need to do so.

Here's an example that shows how this all works. The Linux USB code has been rewritten at least three times. We've done this over time in order to handle things that we didn't originally need to handle, like high speed devices, and just because we learned the problems of our first design, and to fix bugs and security issues. Each time we made changes in our api, we updated all of the kernel drivers that used the apis, so nothing would break. And we deleted the old functions as they were no longer needed, and did things wrong. Because of this, Linux now has the fastest USB bus speeds when you test out all of the different operating systems. We max out the hardware as fast as it can go, and you can do this from simple userspace programs, no fancy kernel driver work is needed.

Now Windows has also rewritten their USB stack at least 3 times, with Vista, it might be 4 times, I haven't taken a look at it yet. But each time they did a rework, and added new functions and fixed up older ones, they had to keep the old api functions around, as they have taken the stance that they can not break backward compatibility due to their stable API viewpoint. They also don't have access to the code in all of the different drivers, so they can't fix them up. So now the Windows core has all 3 sets of API functions in it, as they can't delete things. That means they maintain the old functions, and have to keep them in memory all the time, and it takes up engineering time to handle all of this extra complexity. That's their business decision to do this, and that's fine, but with Linux, we didn't make that decision, and it helps us remain a lot smaller, more stable, and more secure.

And by secure, I really mean it. A lot of times a security problem will be found in one driver, or in one core part of the kernel, and the kernel developers fix it, and then go and fix it up in all other drivers that have the same problem. Then, when the fix is released, all users of all drivers are now secure. When other operating systems don't have all of the drivers in their tree, if they fix a security problem, it's up to the individual companies to update their drivers and fix the problem too. And that rarely happens. So people who buy the device, and then use the older driver that comes in the box with the device, which is insecure. This has happened a lot recently, and really shows how having a stable api can actually hurt end users, when the original goal was to help developers.

@hrvoje

Ok, iako takav način razvoja i krpanja kernela nije spriječio pojavu ranjivosti koje su vidljive u tablici iz članka..

No moja namjera je bila šireg aspekta, jer os nije sami kernel..  

bas lijepo iznenadenje... Normalan razgovor.

mada na pitanje nije odgovoreno osim ako je to api usb... Nije ni potrebno odgovarati jer odgovora nema. Kad je nesto zanimljivo bit ce i hacknuto androidići ili kad je glavna nagrada mac prvog ga hacknu...

Da se ispravim, pobrkale mi se brojke iako sam who writes linux čitao neki dan. 4171 je onih koji su napisali nešto za kernel, dok od toga 1963 onih, ili skoro 50% koji su pridonijeli prvi put!

http://www.techrepublic.com/article/torvalds-isnt-always-nice-but-developers-dont-care/

 -jedini problem u novčanoj transkciji, nije bug radio statistiku (mada mi liči na arijelovce).. tako da ništa od skijanja/jahtanja ovaj put, samo dnevnica (posljednjih par godina dnevnicu na području emea-cro isplačuju s reciklažnim notesićima i kemijskom (lowteč)).

 Sve se to lijepo uspješno zaobilazi, trampu je teško pratiti.  Skoro svaka zemlja ima microsoftov ured, recimo Vidaković sklopi dogovor sa Bugovim čovjekom gore, i oni napišu neku vijest ili nešto u njihovu korist. A za uzvrat dobe besplatne windowse, office, ma hrpu stvari ovisi o dogoovru. Isto kao sto je HRT povezan sa vladom, oni su u mogučnosti cenzurirati neke sadržaje.  

Činjenica je kada bude netko išao googlati o sigurnosti OS-a onda će im izbaciti ovu vijest i oni ce odma pomisliti ajde ako je to veliki informatički časopis napisao onda je to istina.