fuzija bi se mogla kontrolirati smanjivanjem ili gašenjem laserskih emitera, a do lancane reakcije bi teze doslo zato sto je fuzija vise manje stabilna, puno stabilnija od fisije...
moze li kemijski laser, ili vise njih uzrogovati toliku temperaturu?
Kod lasera mi se cini da je glavni problem velicina tog cuda, i vjerojatno snaga koju trose:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8485669.stm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HiPER
Evo o sto opcenito pise o tome:
"Laser driven systems were initially believed to be able to generate commercially useful amounts of energy. However, as estimates of the energy required to reach ignition grew dramatically during the 1970s and '80s, these hopes were abandoned. Given the low efficiency of the laser amplification process (about 1 to 1.5%), and the losses in generation (steam-driven turbine systems are typically about 35% efficient), fusion gains would have to be on the order of 350 just to break even. These sorts of gains appeared to be impossible to generate, and ICF work turned primarily to weapons research. With the recent introduction of fast ignition, things have changed dramatically. In this approach gains of 100 are predicted in the first experimental device, HIPER. Given a gain of about 100 and a laser efficiency of about 1%, HiPER produces about the same amount of fusion energy as electrical energy was needed to create it."
.
