Nvidia GTX 600 (Kepler) Info

jos bolje :) mozda nije na hd 78xx seriji

Ma de ljudi, sve su to odlicne karte, ja nidgje nisam rekao da sam hejter jednih ili drugih, licno vise volim drivere Nvidie, ali i volim OC potencijal Radeon, kada bi se to nekako moglo spojiti hehe.

Sto se tice single gpu, ne moze se fulati, multi gpu je druga prica.

Tacno je sto je Ante rekao, nisam imao vecih problema sa HD 7950 DCII, sem asusove greske, ali eto zeropower nije radio i taj BSOD sa dva monitor, ne pada mi napamet nesto drugo sada.

Mislis MSAA off FXAA High ili?

A sta ce ekipa sa 1680x1050 monitorima? Testiramo onako kako se dogovorimo da testiramo... lijepo sam pitao covjeka sto je tocno mislio jer mi je nejasno iz njegovog komentara.

moze kako god zelite svejedno mi je.. ja idem sad na put pa necu moc odvrtit do nedjelje navecer.. a da se otvori tema b3 benchmark? pozz

Boldano nikako ne razumijem. Sjecam se da je i Microman pricao o tome i Crysis-u (prvi crysis, ne crysis 2), odnosno da se sve gladje izvodi na Nvidia karticama, nego na AMDovim, bez obzira na to da igra radi na isto frejmova. Po kojoj logici?

nesjecam se da je on takvo nesto govorio.. doduse bilo je govora da je fermi imao veci min fps od konkurentnih grafa iz drugog tabora..

I kakav ti je geforce u odnosu na amd? 

sta su ti bolje gtx 600 od hd 7000 serije...

Ne isplati se ako nisi siguran da mozes da izvuces garu.

http://www.protis.hr/products/details/graficka-kartica-gigabyte-hd7870-oc-2gb-gddr5-hdmi-dvi-dp/56804

 bas gledam ovu moju 7870.. gamad poskupila cak 100kn!! bila je 1900 i sica..  jbeni lihvari..

I "respektabilniji" testeri, istina dvije uparene vga, imaju slične dojmove uspoređujući ih na istim frekvama - Ati daje više FPS ali nevidija bolji ukupni dojam u igrama  :)

"

We've beaten this topic into the ground in the past, but it has been a while since we brought it up. There is a smoothness to SLI we just can't put in words. We know for a fact that NVIDIA uses an algorithm that smoothes "frametime" in SLI. We don't know what it’s called, or even how it works, but we know it exists, and we know NVIDIA employs some special sauce when it comes to SLI. It is something that can only be felt, as you play a game, it is not something that shows up in a framerate over time graph. So what you see is AMD CFX winning in framerate, but not winning in frametime or overall game smoothness.

When you sit down, and play games on SLI, the gaming experience just feels smoother and more responsive at lower framerates compared to AMD CrossFireX. With AMD CrossFireX we find that the faster the framerate, the smoother it feels, and we often need higher framerates with AMD CFX for it to feel the same smoothness that NVIDIA SLI feels. So, in all our testing in this article this is why we say that technically AMD 7950 CFX is faster in framerate, but in terms of the actual experience, SLI wins hands down. Gaming with SLI, especially at NV Surround resolutions, just feels better, period. While this is subjective, we are fairly sure that most of our readers would easily identify this in a "Pepsi Challenge" scenario.

We are still looking for ways to illustrate this frametime advantage to you in a proper "scientific" way. As it stands now, all fully reliable avenues to us in this regard are simply too resource intensive to simply "add on" to our reviews. It is also worth expressing that some data collection methods you have seen developed elsewhere are simply not "correct," and we want to be as accurate as possible before exposing data on this topic. NVIDIA has promised upcoming tools for illustrating this, but we have yet to see anything develop. Till then, our subjective impressions are all we have to offer, but as stated above, some of these are more black and white than shades of gray when you experience these first hand."

Novi beta driveri i novo ubrzanje, kažu i do 26%...LINK!

Rat sa performansama između dva tabora se nastavlja