﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><copyright>Copyright 2003-2026 Bug &amp; dizzy.hr</copyright><ttl>30</ttl><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 07:27:23 GMT</pubDate><managingEditor>pisma@bug.hr</managingEditor><language>hr</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 22:13:44 GMT</lastBuildDate><description>Tema unutar podforuma Kućišta i napajanja</description><title>SilverStone vs fortron</title><link>http://forum.bug.hr/forum/topic/kucista-napajanja/silverstone-vs-fortron/31933.aspx</link><item><title>SilverStone vs fortron</title><description>Znaci oni su ovde zapucali&amp;nbsp; skupa napajanja bezpotrebno.Lopovi
Tako ce i bit,uzecu neko malo slabije od ovih.De mi reci koje je bolje hiper ili fortron inace,njih mi je najlakse nabavit,s tim st...</description><link>http://forum.bug.hr/forum/post/kucista-napajanja/silverstone-vs-fortron/486281.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 22:13:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f5f917694c3beec0a4be4631d8ebecc4</guid><category /></item><item><title>RE: SilverStone vs fortron</title><description>
Nema to veze kaj pise.
&amp;nbsp;
4870 drzi corsair cx 400.</description><link>http://forum.bug.hr/forum/post/kucista-napajanja/silverstone-vs-fortron/486280.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 22:13:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">63c5800af8cf01bd002a9495d0cbf42f</guid><category /></item><item><title>RE: SilverStone vs fortron</title><description>
Ovo:Klik!!!
To napajanje drži i moju konfu(XFX HD 4890,Phenom II 955)</description><link>http://forum.bug.hr/forum/post/kucista-napajanja/silverstone-vs-fortron/486273.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 22:08:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f01e12689f887133ead72fb2c62cf557</guid><category /></item><item><title>SilverStone vs fortron</title><description>&amp;nbsp;
Pise da graficka zahtjeva min. 500w brand napajanje
&amp;nbsp;
http://ati.amd.com/products/certified/powersupplies.html
&amp;nbsp;
Silverstone otpada jer ga nemogu nabavit,znaci sad mi je dvojba i...</description><link>http://forum.bug.hr/forum/post/kucista-napajanja/silverstone-vs-fortron/486267.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 22:03:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">527b269548f51a4b7e6dcc3fb12d29c7</guid><category /></item><item><title>RE: SilverStone vs fortron</title><description>
Ja imam SilverStone 600W&amp;nbsp; ima 80 PLUS BRONZE certifikat, 81 - 87% efficiency i zadovoljan sam njime.
Napajanje je nečujno i ima sve konektore koji mi trebaju ili će mi zatrebati ako uzmem još ...</description><link>http://forum.bug.hr/forum/post/kucista-napajanja/silverstone-vs-fortron/486227.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:32:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70e4dd394dc7af242245eac88e4b94be</guid><category /></item><item><title>RE: SilverStone vs fortron</title><description>
Slazem se, model od 500w je i previse za tvoju konfu.
ST50F model (500w) moze isporuciti preko 590w kotinuirano,
80+ iskoristivost, tako da nema brige.</description><link>http://forum.bug.hr/forum/post/kucista-napajanja/silverstone-vs-fortron/486216.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:20:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">be19963743e218091cf1b7eb137e1db9</guid><category /></item><item><title>RE: SilverStone vs fortron</title><description>
Uzmi silverstona,ali od 500W (a i to je malo pretjerano) jer najvjerojatnije matična ne podržava CF.</description><link>http://forum.bug.hr/forum/post/kucista-napajanja/silverstone-vs-fortron/485568.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:47:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0e6dd841251e26c7e3c219a03a4831c9</guid><category /></item><item><title>SilverStone vs fortron</title><description>Koje je napajanje bolje?Ja sam planirao uzet Silverstone SST-ST56F-560W a nasao sam i Fortron Epsilon 80Plus 600W s tim da je Fortron skuplji 20&amp;euro; pa bi mi godilo vise Silverstone,Konfiguracija je...</description><link>http://forum.bug.hr/forum/post/kucista-napajanja/silverstone-vs-fortron/485105.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:13:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">1d1af8a641994cdd9d54bcad734a85d4</guid><category /></item></channel></rss>